3 Americas: More Truth Than We Can Handle 03 The Story of the Ham Sandwich That Wouldn’t Go Along To Get Along, And Didn’t Get Into the Bigotucky Law School (And the murder of Breana Taylor, and the truth about the hanging of Leo Frank, and the founding of the “Anti-Defecation League”)

(Last updated: September 1, 2021)
3 Americas: More Truth Than We Can Handle
Chapter 03
The Story of the Ham Sandwich That Wouldn’t Go Along To Get Along, And Didn’t Get Into the Bigotucky Law School, and THE MURDER OF BREONNA TAYLOR, and the truth about the hanging of Leo Frank, and the founding of the “Anti-Defecation League”)
by DR Wolfe

{As I continue a full revision, this is one of the new chapters from my revised autobiography, “3 Americas”.}

(Includes strong language)

Maybe you can indict a ham sandwich, or a black man, or any “cripple”, but you can’t indict a cop or a person with wealth in America, for anything, let alone murdering a black woman. So let me begin this chapter with a comment about Bigotucky , and why I believe the Breonna Taylor case explains everything that happened to me.

It’s amazing the lies the Bigotuckians will tell to hide their bigotry and racism, or get some “South Carolina Negro to say it (posing as the State Attorney General).

My biological father and his family were all from Owensboro, Kentucky. When I was around five or six, I remember he would always talk about “Going down to Detroit and killing all the Coloreds.” I don’t know if they ever actually killed anybody, but they kept the body of a dead, brown-skinned woman in this root cellar that was underneath Grandpa Ernie’s bar.

They said she was my great aunt, who was Native-American, but I wonder?

He did own a hand gun, I remember. Once he pointed it at my mom and us kids, when we were sitting on the couch. And he definitely knew how to use it, since he was trained by the Army, up in Tacoma. Maybe he never stopped working for the Army, like Timothy McVey.

As far as Breonna Taylor goes, the fact that the Kentucky Attorney General, Daniel Cameron, who is black, is not aware that Breonna Taylor was actually shot six times, and not five, shows the general incompetence and indifference of Kentucky’s bigoted legal system toward the little people. Because it matters to Breonna Taylor, since its possible that the sixth bullet is the one that actually killed her.

Consider this. The fact that the officers sent the ambulance away an hour before the home invasion took place suggests they planned to kill everyone in the apartment, and wanted to make sure there were no living witnesses. The cops do this all the time, refusing to let the paramedics do their job, until the witness is dead.

When the ambulance returned, it was twenty minutes before they were allowed to render assistance to Breonna, although they immediately treated an officer who had been shot in the leg.

I believe they were given a “no knock warrant” for Ms. Taylor’s apartment based on false evidence that she had received drugs through the mail, saying the post master general provided this verbal information. However, the post master general disputes this claim. Why didn’t Judge Shaw require any proof in writing from the post office itself, before signing the “no knock warrant”? The answer is that most of these judges are lazy, and care nothing about the little people, who live in the wrong neighborhood.

It has been reported that the judge signed five warrants in twelve minutes, when she processed the warrant that eventually killed Breonna Taylor.

However, the warrant was changed to a “knock and announce warrant” sometime before the raid. Why? Who did this?

Maybe the police who were conducting the raid weren’t happy about this change, and ignored it? A month later, in an interview with ABC one of the officers admits ignoring the changed warrant.

I believe this information is critical and understanding why they murdered Breonna Taylor on March 13th, a little after midnight, when no one would likely be around, or awake.

Why didn’t they come over during the day, and ask her, “When is the last time you saw your ex-boyfriend, and do you mind if we search the apartment?” If they had a search warrant, we can assume she would have let them search because they had nothing to hide. Besides, we’re supposed to believe a boyfriend from two years ago, would have left drugs at her apartment.

Apparently despite having no physical evidence. they told the court they believed she had received drugs through the mail on behalf of her boyfriend, Jamarcus Clover. But if they had any credible evidence of this, it would have been an arrest warrant, not a search warrant. Other than Oregon, isn’t it a crime to send or receive drugs through the U.S. Postal Service?

Maybe they were determined to teach this “Negro” a lesson about trafficking “drugs” in Bigotucky?

and would if the drug they’re referring to in the warrant was only marijuana? Since more than half of America has legalized it, is their any justification in this sort of extreme violence by the police?

Breonna Taylor had broke up with Mr. Clover long before this, and was dating a man named Kenneth Walker when she was murdered. Mr. Walker did not use drugs, and there was no drugs found in the apartment.

So how long is long enough not to be held personally responsible, if a woman’s ex-boyfriend is breaking the law? Feminist should be outraged by this killing, because it sends the message that a woman can be held accountable for what her ex-boyfriend is doing, as if she would know. Of course, if she were a white woman living in Kentucky this warrant would have never been issued. Which means this was premeditated-murder, because it should have never happened.

In fact, prior to killing Breonna Taylor, the police had located Mr. Clover, and its very likely he told them that Breonna and him were no longer together.

Given this, assuming the police had the information, I would argue that this warrant to search her residence should have never been issued. Perhaps, the police withheld this information from Circuit Judge Shaw, who signed the “no knock warrant”, with absolutely no physical evidence against Breonna Taylor.

So maybe Judge Mary Shaw should also be investigated for signing a “no knock warrant” against someone who was clearly a very, very soft target?

So why did they go to her apartment in the middle of the night, with a battering ram? And why did they send the ambulance away before the raid, which violated their own policy? Were they intending to kill Breonna and her boyfriend? I think so. Here’s the proof.

Only one unidentified witness out of twelve said they heard the police announce themselves before opening fire and breaking down the door, which is required under the “knock and announce warrant”. But studies by the Innocence Project show eye-witnesses are more often wrong. Either they intentionally lie to please the police, or embellish their story to appear in agreement with the prosecutor’s long-winding tail. Or they simply have a faulty memory.

The interview by ABC’s show, Perspective, of one of the police officers who was involved in killing Breonna Taylor (Sergeant Maddenly) was very revealing…

the cop admitted that at first, he only pounded on the door, but didn’t announce their presence. No matter the reason, this conduct violated the revised warrant. He should have yelled “POLICE”, while he was knocking. Or even better, he should have yelled “POLICE”, and then knocked.

“We don’t want the targets to formulate a plan”, he said, as though some heavily armed drug dealers were inside. When they in fact knew otherwise.

He said after he knocked, they heard a noise coming from inside the apartment. He claimed they never heard Breonna and her boyfriend yelling, “Who’s there?” And apparently, they never identified themselves as police.

According to Mr. Walker, Breonna and him both yelled for the intruder to identify themselves, but Maddenly admits they did not.

Then he told the ABC pressitute, an agent of the Deep State, that he pounded on the door again, and six of the officers began chanting “Police”. Except, ten of the eleven witnesses, who were startled awoke by the pounding, did not hear the police announce their presence. But they certainly heard the gun fire, which may have muted the actual yells.

Somebody is definitely lying, we know that. So do we believe the seven cops and the one eye-witness, or do we believe the ten other witnesses, and Mr. Walker?

Because maybe the police only began yelling “POLICE” after Mr. Walker fired his gun, and they returned fire. Maybe that’s when the police began yelling “POLICE”. Which would be a completely natural response, being fired upon.

As we know, police always lie to protect their own. That’s why there are no good cops any more, because the ones who don’t actually engage in criminal behavior , are protecting the ones that do.

If you listen closely, you can hear how nervous Maddenly is during the interview, as if he knows he has something to hide. He’s trying to explain to the audience why the police need to be so militant when they approach a soft target, in the middle of the night. But he doesn’t explain why a soft target needs to be ambushed in the middle of the night, with guns blazing.

He sounds jacked up on something, like cocaine, Amphetamines, meth, or maybe steroids. Unfortunately, cops are rarely drug tested, so we’ll never know.

Maddenly is talking fast, and doesn’t clearly answer the question when he’s asked how many cops said the word police. And whether this was before or after Mr. Walker fired his gun.

This is because he is lying, as cops often do, to cover up their wrong doing. Then they lie to protect their lie. And now this dirty cop is suing Mr. Walker for his injuries. So maybe he’ll be caught in a lie, or two, and be sent to prison on a charge of perjury. Probably not, but we can hope.

But to understand how the Deep State media covers up for these sort of killings, one only needs to compare how the media covered the case of Victor Salva, a movie producer, who was working with Disney at the time. He was convicted of molesting underage male actors and was sent to prison.

ABC followed the “justified homicide of Breonna Taylor” story with a bullshit piece about cops getting this great training, and having to make split decisions about killing one of us “cripple” people. Usually they have no choice, according to ABC.

While they didn’t come right out and say it, this second story by the Disney Network was to suggest to the viewer that the Breonna Taylor killing was also somehow justified, based on their expert training. And a week later, Walter Wallace of Philadelphia was gunned down in the same exact way by the Philadelphia Police.

You have to ask, is the Deep State behind all of this killing, just like the widespread corruption and pedophilia that seems to control our leaders?

consider this, for years law enforcement didn’t prosecute Jeff Epstein for his crimes against children. And the mainstream media completely ignored the story. When they finally did prosecute Epstein in 2008, the U.S. Attorney, Alexander Acosta, gave him a sweetheart deal where he only had to serve a little more than one year in prison, and got “work release” for twelve hours per day. And all of his fellow child molesters, like Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, David Copperfield, former-Israel Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and America’s dirtiest lawyer, Alan “Douche-o-witz” (who happens to be Jewish, like sex predators, Jeff Epstein and Harvey Weinstein), and the hundreds and hundreds of mostly men, got complete immunity from prosecution.

The Injustice Department cleared Acosta of all wrong doing in 2020, and said he acted appropriately. Maybe they could try to argue that Epstein got a “fair deal” from Acosta, based on the “evidence”. Although, there were at least three dozen victims who had come forward by this time. Epstein and his lawyers did everything to frighten and intimidate them, during the investigation.

however, to my knowledge never has a plea bargain included a provision that allowed all of the other criminal conspirators to get away with their crimes against children.

And what really proves Acosta is nothing more than another dirty government lawyer, is that this “Non-Prosecutorial Agreement” includes a provision where all the victims would receive a civil settlement.

The U.S. Attorneys Office can prosecute criminals, but they never negotiate civil settlements for the victims. Especially when the victims are unaware that any settlement was made. That is illegal.

In fact, Acosta and his band of government lawyers from south Florida lied to them and claimed it was still under investigation, when they had already worked out a secret deal with Epstein’s lawyers and the State Attorney for Palm Beach County, according to Brad Edwards book, “Relentless Pursuit”.

And if this wasn’t enough, President Trump appointed Alexander Acosta, perhaps as an award for his loyalty to the elite, to be the Secretary of Labor.

So we can only conclude that the government of the United States and the media is protecting the pedophiles who run our government and the media, who seem to be all blackmailed. The constant phony fear porn over COVID-19 and anti-Semitism, just like 9-11.

And now, they say the only solution is to take the vaccine, or else. But they won’t tell us what’s in the vaccine, because it’s proprietary.

Meanwhile, CBS fired one of their own producers, Ashley Bianco, for outing an ABC anchor, Amy Robach, who said off air, into a hot microphone, that the Disney Corporation and ABC were squashing every story about Epstein and his child trafficking business, for years and years.

We know this part of the story is true, since Maxwell and Epstein had been providing children to the elite since the early 1990’s.

But it’s really about blackmailing our leaders for Israel and the Deep State. While Disney is going to apparently create a transgender, Jewish superhero who is going to protect these international child molesters and banksters (and label all of their accusers, anti-Semites, even though most of them are not really semitic).

And maybe that’s why the F.B.I. and the Injustice Department sat on Hunter Biden’s laptop, which includes evidence of corruption and Child endangerment., since December 9th, of 2019. Maybe all of law enforcement is part of this international child trafficking ring, and the media, the Injustice Department, and the F.B.I. are protecting them. Which also means, not really investigating the murder of Breonna Taylor or George Floyd,, or any other poor person the police kill?

Instead of focusing on the COVID-19 crisis, conduct a hopeless impeachment over a phone call, in which the President of the United States asks the President of Ukraine to investigate both Joe and Hunter Biden for corruption.

Where by the way, Hunter Biden, a former crack head, allegedly, was being paid $83,000 per month (for five years). And according to one E mail, is giving half of his [Hunter] salary to someone called the “Big Guy”, who we’ve been told is no one other than, Joe Biden.

Meanwhile, NPR and the gender-impaired Deep State media is using fear to scare the American public into supporting the Deep State candidate, Joe Biden. While not telling the voters anything about Hunter Biden, and how his father is probably already being blackmailed by China and Israel, while saying “It’s only disinformation from the Russians.” Haven’t we heard this lie before?

But according to the people who have seen the contents of the laptop, there are reported to be 80,000 images and 36,000 E mails that don’t appear to be fake, but are very incriminating. Has the media reported any of this?

This is an outrage! That the mainstream Deep State media isn’t reporting it (until after the election). And it’s a lie by omission…just like the killing of Breonna Taylor and the explosives they used to bring down the twin towers, and Building 7.

When this is all over, maybe NPR, more than anyone else, should lose their federal funding, if they are covering up the story to make sure Joe Biden gets elected. This is tampering with an election, and it’s seems criminal. But they’re all doing it, and getting away with it, while scaring the American people with fear porn about COVID-19, White Nationalism, and terrorism.

Make no mistake, I think president Trump is an arrogant, selfish bastard, who also works for the Israel Zionists. He almost always defends the cops, and knows he is destroying Social Security and Medicare with his payroll tax cuts. But he probably has a good case against the Democreeps for tampering with both the 2016, and again the 2020, presidential elections, if the Supreme Court takes the case. Which they won’t.

I believe that we have to give up the secret ballot if we ever want to have a fair election again. Its to easy for either side to cheat as long as we pretend that secrecy is essential to democracy. That’s another big fat lie they’re telling us!

We need to be able to link every ballot with every voter. And we need to verify, as individuals, that the correct vote was recorded for each of us.

The tabulation machines are probably being used to steal the election, so we need to count by hand, by precinct, on line, so we all can watch. Who cares if it takes a month to count the votes, as long as we get it right. Only the cheaters and liars will want to rush it along, like going to war with Iraq, and like blaming Osama bin Laden for 9-11 (before there’s an investigation), just like they always do.

Today, it’s not very likely husbands and fathers are threatening their wives and daughters to vote a certain way. In fact, it’s more likely that wives are coercing their husbands into voting for a gender-impaired Democreep, even if they disagree.

“If you ever want some of this again, then you’ll vote the way I say!”

So, back to the killing of Breonna Taylor.

We know informants, who the police use all the time to obtain unlawful warrants, are some of the most sleaziest people around. The kind of people who don’t work, but need drug money.

Does this eye-witness have any reason to lie for the police? We’ll probably never know. Unfortunately, the grand jury process doesn’t ever scrutinize or cross examine witnesses (that help the state protect the police).

That’s why I believe the grand jury system should be completely abolished in America

It should be entirely up to the prosecutors whether or not a person is indicted. Presumably, they have all the evidence they were planning to present to the grand jury. Or maybe, is the grand jury really Kabuki Theater, where they can practice their performance before going in front of a real jury?

If there is no grand jury, the prosecutor will be held accountable when they go against the will of the people, to protect the police, and wrongfully indict a poor defendant, represented by the public defender. Then we’ll clearly see how the prosecutors work closely with the police, to protect the police. Getting witnesses to lie or withhold information in order to indict the rest of us little people, who can’t afford bail, here in third America. Then bail becomes a leverage that they can use against the poor.

That’s why the grand jury is secret. Not to protect witnesses, but rather, to protect their lies.

It’s obvious, the police planned to kill both Breonna Taylor and Kenneth Walker that night. Yet, because of one lying witness, the police officers are allowed to go home, unlike Ms. Taylor.

But what clearly makes this case a cover up of her murder, is that the City of Louisville had not determined whether or not the warrant was legal, which I believe, it was not. Even after six months, they couldn’t decide?

But obviously, by not deciding they could keep this fact from the grand jury, and insure the police would not likely be indicted.

The officers who murdered her should not have been brought before the grand jury until the validity of the search warrant was determined. Once the warrant was found to be illegal, which is what should happen, then everything these officers did would be unlawful. Not just recklessly shooting into some one else’s apartment, which makes no sense, unless they were completely out of control.

There is hope, since this case can be brought before another grand jury, once Kentucky’s Attorney General is replaced, and it won’t be considered “double jeopardy”.

On the night of March 12th, about an hour before killing Breonna, police had apparently met outside and formulated a plan, and they showed up with a battering ram. They were required to knock and announce their presence, but obviously they never did. Just proceeded to bang on the door for thirty or forty seconds. Then when they were fired upon, they returned fire, and then began yelling “POLICE”.

If the police had first knocked, and announced their presence, we can assume Mr. Walker would have cooperated by opening the door. He had nothing to hide, and no reason to not let them in.

Instead the police said nothing, when the couple was startled awake and they demanded the intruder identify themselves. The plain clothes police said nothing, according to Mr. Walker.

Understandably, Mr. Walker assumed some hoodlums were breaking into the apartment, which wasn’t far from the truth. He fired one warning shot, and they immediately returned fire, discharging thirty-two rounds.

It seems logical that Breonna Taylor and Kenneth Walker would have willingly opened the door if they heard the intruder identify themselves as police. They were not wanted for anything, and they had nothing to hide. And certainly wouldn’t have endangered themselves by firing a gun at the police, for any reason. If they were the criminal the police would like us to believe, why didn’t Mr. Walker fire five or six shots to make sure he killed or injured all of the police. Then Breonna and him could make their get away?

Instead, Mr. Walker immediately called 911, and cried, some one had killed his girlfriend.

This was not self-defense as the Kentucky Attorney General claims. If the police are fired upon, they are required to identify the shooter before returning fire. Can the police blindly fire into a crowd , if someone shoots off a gun?

If they killed Kenneth Walker, they might be able to claim self-defense, but there’s no justification for killing Breonna Taylor, an innocent third party.

They never saw Mr. Walker before firing their guns. And the fact they were charged with reckless endangerment for shooting into another apartment, proves that Breonna Taylor was also recklessly endangered when they opened fire. But we shouldn’t blame the grand jury for their ignorance, but rather, the man who presented them with the wrong interpretation of the actual law about self-defense.

She was an unarmed third party, which means the police were reckless and willful in everything they did that night, including getting the “no knock warrant from Judge Shaw on an extremely soft target. They knew, or should know, that any “no knock warrant” would very likely become lethal.

But this is how these drug enforcement officers behave. There are countless innocent people killed every year by the DEA and local law enforcement, working together. And there is almost never any criminal charges filed against the police, or the misinformed grand jury, who doesn’t issue an indictment (based on what they were told).

Almost everyone, who isn’t a cop, knows the drug task force units are some of the most sleaziest, deceitful cops anywhere, other than the U.S. Marshals and the sex offender units.

So we are forced to ask, did they plan to kill Ms. Taylor and Mr. Walker? And did they believed they would get away with it, because the victims were black? Yes. And I think the story below about University of Kentucky Professor Brad Cannon explains how blatantly racist and bigoted this state is, when it comes to how they treat blacks, the poor, and other minorities.

Did you know that there is no tax in Kentucky on thoroughbreds (that are sold to wealthy Arabs), while things like bread, milk, and diapers are heavily taxed?

Without question, throughout my younger life, I had one of the most diverse “education’s” of almost anyone anywhere ever (and that’s not just because of the love I had for keg parties and playing music, may appreciation for cannabis, or my former-obsession over college football (i.e. “fake ball”!).
{To learn more about my own unhealthy obsession over sports, read the story and the article I wrote titled, “Chip Ball” and “Is Football Now Fake Ball?”}

I suppose you could say, as a writer, it’s been the most amazing opportunity ever! Along with several junior colleges and a summer program at the University of Detroit, I briefly attended Michigan State University, the University of Central Florida, Florida State University, Georgia State University, the University of Kentucky, and most recently, Portland State University.

somewhere in there, over the last twenty some years, I received two degrees, mostly studying law, political science, and mathematics, and graduated with honors (with a GPA of 3.54).

However, in 1998, I believe I was black-balled by the University of Kentucky Law School and its disability office, partly for offending a creepy professor from the Paterson School (and his spooky Deep State “spook girl friend”), and for outing a racist, highly defamatory case study published by a constitutional law professor from U-K, named Brad Cannon.

Here’s the facts, then you get to decide if Kentucky violated my rights as an applicant, and its obligation to completely diversify its publicly funded law school. And allow qualified individuals with disabilities to participate in the process?

Would I have completed law school in three years? I very well May not have been able to. Especially knowing that the disability office wouldn’t be giving me the same support as other disabled students (who didn’t have the courage to rock their little river boat).

After all, a University that recklessly would allow its maintenance department:
To leave off manhole covers, with no barricades (a manhole cover which was located along the University’s main sidewalk);
To park trucks with ladders hanging out the back end of the truck along a public sidewalk outside of its health center . a sidewalk regularly used by blind students.

You might say, this univesity has a real serious problem in its failure to accommodate students with disabilities …as the reader will soon discover.

Let me make one thing clear. As a licensed, practicing attorney in Kentucky, you can bet one of my very first law suits would have been against the University of Kentucky itself. And based on my long well-documented history of being an aggressive advocate for those with disabilities, you can bet that if I were excepted into the law school, they weren’t going to do anything to assist me in earning my degree in any way.

So let me begin this story by telling you about what happened with Brad Cannon and his “Constitutional Law” class (where law school applicants are apparently screened by the University of Kentucky (maybe to keep out any “uppity Negro’s” or any “Negro lovers”).

I won’t pretend to be a fighter for African-American rights, but I am a defender of what is right, and fair. And what is ethical.

As I’ll explain a little later, it’s just as likely that what happen at the [Deep State] Paterson School also played a part in why I was denied a chance to earn a law degree from the “highly exclusive” law school, located in Lexington, Kentucky.

First, so you know, there are two types of case studies used in the study of law.

The first type are based on actual cases, and the real names may or may not be used. But the author will usually inform the reader in advance as to whether or not the true identities are being revealed.

The second type of case study is based on a fictional case, using fictional names. And most authors will usually also reveal this to the reader in advance.

However, the two case studies, one of which I objected to, and that Professor Cannon passed out to our class (and apparently all of his previous Constitutional Law classes) used the actual names of four public figures, although the case itself was apparently fictional.

The case study in question described how La Toya Jackson allegedly was having a sexual affair with her infamous brother, Michael.

After receiving a “C” for the class, I filed a grade appeal, and included evidence that this case study help prove the professor regularly, and openly, practiced discrimination against minorities.

It was obvious to me, when he spoke of the two case studies he handed out, he was speaking in “white code” and was openly challenging any of us to dare to publicly raise an objection to his righteous performance. Sadly, none of us had the courage to say anything at the time, although I suspect his personal racism and bigotry was obvious, hopefully, to most.

During his performance, Professor Cannon claimed by also passing out a similar case study about two white celebrities, Clint Eastwood and Rozanne Barr, who were also allegedly having a intimate relationship, his personal attack against La Toya wasn’t racist or discriminatory. And certainly wasn’t liable since they were all public figures.

So you know, this last point is most likely true since they were all public figures. That is, unless the “celebrities” could prove both malice on his part and actual damages, showing they were financially injured.

Because Cannon had presented his racist case study in a educational forum, he would likely be able to argue he had a “fair use” exemption under the law to any claim for damages against him or the University. Only the University and the State of Kentucky had the power to force Professor Cannon to end this practice of using his classroom to publicly humiliate African-Americans (and other minorities), by suggesting incest was a normal practice among certain groups.

But just like the maintenance department, who recklessly injured myself and one other blind student, for years and years the University of Kentucky did absolutely nothing to stop Professor Cannon.

However, I accurately did point out in my appeal, since I thought I had nothing else to lose, that Clint and Rozanne were not brother and sister, and therefore, Cannon’s ignorant comparison was self-evident of his intent to humiliate both of the Jackson’s, and any African-Americans who would dare take his class (which is required to attend law school).

While one could argue Michael Jackson, by his behavior, had invited some of this scrutiny, La Toya did not. He had no right to humiliate her in this most outrageous way, simply because Michael Jackson was her brother. But this is how most Kentuckians think, and probably why I didn’t get into their law school.

In my grade appeal, I argued Cannon’s attack against La Toya Jackson , as both a woman and a minority, documented at the very least the possibility of his bigoted attitude and arrogant practice of discrimination toward all minorities and any other protected class, including students with disabilities.

So you know, Brad Cannon used a walking cane, and therefore, is himself a person with a disability. However, I argued that his position of power, along with his subtle threat to determine who would and who would not get into the Kentucky Law School, makes his own physical impairment completely irrelevant in my claim of discrimination.

Further, it’s interesting that he chose in his other case study to describe a rugged cowboy, like Clint Eastwood, having an affair with a woman that the networks and Hollyweird have specifically portrayed as being unattractive. He could have picked any actress he wanted, yet he specifically chose Rozanne Barr instead? Was this supposed to be another subtle slur against both La Toya and Rozanne?

When I first met Professor Cannon in his office, he made sure to tell me, in white code, about his overwhelming influence over the admissions office to the law school, and apparently, he was right.

Not surprisingly, my application for law school was denied. And obviously, my grade appeal was also rejected by the University.

Hears the funny thing about this story. Ms. Bakkard from the law school’s admissions and the U-K Disability Office did everything they could that year [1997-1998] to get these two visually-impaired coeds to agree to attend the Kentucky Law School. Except, I heard through the grapevine they were both so disgusted by the University’s lack of accommodations (and politics) they both chose to attend an alternative law school, far away from Lexington . the University of Louisville and the University of Indiana.

Maybe the best part of the story, as far as knowing who the University of Kentucky is really working for (and its direct ties to the deep state), could be best described in this next story.

One of the half dozen courses I took, waiting to establish my residency and to be presumably approved for law school, included a course on espionage from the Paterson School, which is a college inside of the U-K dedicated to training future American spooks for the FBI and the CIA. I can’t remember the name of the course, but it is was something like “Methods and Techniques of Spookology, and How the Deep State Operates Behind the Curtain.”

One day a woman, who said she was a practicing attorney who as I recall handled classified work for the government, came in to speak to our class. She began by going around the room and asking each of us to introduce ourselves and tell the class (and her) a little about ourselves.

When she got to me, she began, “My, you look mighty incognito. Who are you supposed to be?”

So I pulled out my James Bond laser gun and shot her right between the eyes!

Actually, I did nothing other than to remove myself from the situation (before I said something I would regret later).

Since this optometrist, John Musick, from right there in Lexington, Kentucky had just written me a prescription for these large wrap around dark glasses, which apparently some women (like Heidi Tauber) think look really funny and aren’t ashamed to say it aloud.

But I admit, it was shocking to hear a licensed attorney from Kentucky ask a blind student a question like this about their personal assistive device in front of the entire class. But then again, they don’t call it “Bigotucky” for no reason!

At that moment, I had to wonder what she would have said if I had been wearing a prosthetic hand, or some other medical device to accommodate my disability that made her feel uncomfortable?

I almost always wear sun glasses outside because my deteriorated retinas are very sensitive to light, and if I don’t wear the protective glasses, I was once told my squinting makes me look angry. So I almost always wear them, when I’m not home.

Rather than saying anything in retort to this dumb, bigoted remark, made by a lawyer who should know better then to judge anyone by their looks, I shut off my recorder and packed up my books.

Just as I had done once long ago when I heard Sarah Rabin make a ignorant remark about my disability, I said nothing, just stood up, opened up my white folding cane, and left the room.

But instead of immediately defending me, and perhaps publicly reprimanding her, as he should have done, our creepy little professor . a ‘want-to-be-spook’, chased me down the hall and began scolding me for embarrassing him in front of the class. And if you read this book, you will learn what these sick spook bastards and their friends do to people when we embarrass them . when we call them out?

And it may have been nothing more than a coincidence, but when I got screwed out of law school by the University of Kentucky the Disney broadcasters started making “jaking it” jokes during all of the broadcasts of any University of Michigan games, which they knew I never missed. But it was only the sports talk creeps from ESPN and ABC who were using the name “Jake” as if it were a slur, since a few of the games were on other networks.

Not to sound to much like an ‘American Theorist Against Criminal Conspirators. but this is why I think the “Jaking it” jokes came directly from someone at the University of Kentucky?

In 1997, and long before this, there was a man named Dean who provided camera work for all of the Ohio State home games for ESPN and ABC. His kid (who you may remember (if you’re an Ohio State fan) seeing) would run up and down the sidelines with this huge crowd microphone during games.

At the time, this guy Dean was married to the assistant administrator at the U-K’s Disability Office, Sue]. So I strongly suspect that Dean, Sue and the University of Kentucky may have very likely had something to do with the “Jaking it” jokes that coincidentally began shortly after I moved to Lexington in the summer of 1997.

Then what’s even more weird, a few years after I moved back to southeast Portland, Oregon, this kid named “Jake” goes down to the mall and shoots two people, killing both of them, , including Steve Forsyth, a former-employee of InterCom, the local ESPN affiliate.

If you read my writings, you know I have been a real thorn in this 24-hour sports talk moron station’s butt for many, many years because of its long-standing practice of making bigoted comments over the air about people with disabilities.

So it caught my attention when I heard that one of these sports talk morons (Or more accurately, a man who dedicated his wasted career to help raise money to keep these sports talk bastards daily sickness (and distractions) on the air!) was shot and killed by a kid named “Jake”.

Was it just another strange coincidence…or was it some weird sort of karma against those who regularly brutalize the weakest and most vulnerable with their words?

Unfortunately, an angelic hospice nurse named Cindy Yuille . the only truly innocent victim, was also killed when this shooter was apparently rolled off the shelf by his government handler.

Here’s another reason why the University of Kentucky may have screwed me out of law school…perhaps, on behalf of some judge in Atlanta and his vengeful body guard.

Let me begin by telling you about one of the crazy things I used to do when I lived in Atlanta. It has to do with the developing of these extra abilities, which I began testing before I even knew I was testing them.

About twice a month I would ride the MARTA from Brook Haven to the Five Point Station to meet this guy for some weed. After he picked me up, he drove around the block a couple times and would usually let me take a couple puffs, before driving back to the station.

And when he dropped me off, often I would hear the train coming from the direction of downtown Atlanta. So I would take off running and try to catch the train. And I always did make the train. And here’s how I did it.

So there I was, running for the train with my white cane in one out stretched hand, and my other hand barely touching the steel railing. One by one, I would begin jumping the flights of cement stairs…one flight after another.

I always skipped the first flight, so the guard wouldn’t see me. The other four flights I was able to jump, completely, without ever missing.

Here’s the funny thing. I never once injured my ankle and always landed flat on my feet on the cement platform, just inches from the edge of the last step every single time!

And I never hit anyone coming up the stairs. I don’t know how I knew when no one was coming up along the inside, where I was jumping, and where normally most people would walk, but I always seem to know when not to jump. I would imagine being struck in the head or shoulders by a one-hundred and eighty-five pound man hurling through the air would have caused some serious damage to anyone coming up the stairs, but it never happened.

Each flight of stairs included about ten or twelve steps. And even though I had a small amount of shadow vision back then, and could barely tell if someone was standing directly in front of me, I can promise, there’s no way I could see the steps, or anyone coming up the stairs from below.

Because of the traffic outside, and the echo inside the station, it was completely impossible to hear much of anything, let alone tell where any sound was coming from. So, it was done entirely with nothing more than my intuition, and maybe this sixth sense that had begun to take over my brain and how I perceived the world.

I’ll bet the people who sat in the ticket booth upstairs, not to mention the approaching MARTA drivers, got a real kick out of seeing this blind guy flying through the air, with his white cane stretched out behind him, jumping flight, after flight, after flight.

And who knows, MARTA may even have some old video of it if anyone’s interested, since I would assume there were cameras almost everywhere.

So just prior to transferring to Kentucky, where I took a few courses wile submitting an application to their law school, I attended Georgia State University, where I earned my BA (with honors) (and worked two jobs).

Before I get back to the story of my failed effort to pursue a career in law, There are two important stories about Georgia State University I should also talk about. They’re important, because they tell how it really is for those of us who are forced to live here in this ‘Third America’, that Senator Edwards doesn’t know exists.

The first story involves an incident that happened about a year before I graduated.

A graduate student named Michael Smith, who worked in the disability office at Georgia State switched all my answers on one of my political science exams to what he knew was the wrong answer.

I knew this because when I received a “C” on the exam, before I had anyone read any of the questions, it was obvious that someone had tampered with my answers (because I had never gotten less than an “A” on any political science exam, ever).

This creep named , “Michael Smith” told me his dad was a Federal Marshal who guarded one of the federal judges in Atlanta. Eventually he admitted to his crime to Carol Pearson, his supervisor, and agreed to give her back the original exam which he had apparently stashed in the back of one of the file cabinets in the disability office.

So, despite that he admitted to changing my answers and hiding my original exam, GSU did absolutely nothing to punish him. So not surprisingly, in the land of injustice, he wasn’t fired or arrested.

What was even more disappointing was that my advisor and instructor, Bill Thomas, also did absolutely nothing to defend my right to a fair and honest education, other than giving me the “A” I earned. Thanks a lot Bill!

As everyone who knows Professor Thomas, knows he’s one of the most outgoing, friendly professors at Georgia State back then- And I’m extremely grateful that he exposed me to so many cases involving the abuse of our criminal injustice system, including capital punishment, where there is no opportunity to correct the record.

Specifically, I began to learned that the criminal courts in America are almost exclusively use against people of color, the poor, the uneducated and the disabled. Rarely is it used to seriously punish anyone of wealth or influence, even when the crime is mass murder.

Despite our similar views about America’s injustice system, the two cases where Professor Thomas and I strongly disagreed, over the OJ Simpson acquittal and the 1915 hanging of Leo Frank.

While I realize today, based on F. Lee Bailey’s new book, OJ Simpson did not kill his estranged wife, Nicole. At the time, I was absolutely convinced that it was a clear case of reverse discrimination, but I was wrong, and Professor Thomas and the jurors were absolutely right in that case . in finding OJ Simpson not guilty. Clearly, the State did not prove its case.

However, I am right about the complete deceitfulness of Leo Frank and his lawyers, as I will now attempt to prove for the open-minded reader who is interested in the truth.

The ADL, the SPLC, and Professor Thomas claim Leo Frank was hung because he was Jewish, and I feel unfairly compared it to the lynching of thousands of innocent blacks throughout the south during this time in our history. And one hundred years later, they are still blaming a black man for the murder. Or that’s the implication, by claiming Frank is innocent.

Sure, Frank didn’t get a chance to exhaust all of his appeals, but there’s no doubt that he did the crime.

My research proves that from the moment the murder in question was committed, Frank, his lawyers and supporters all used their money and influence to buy off the national press and the legal system, and continue to perpetrate this hoax even today. After buying off the governor, who issued a commutation, they eventually hoped to get an acquittal for Frank.

However, the outraged people of Atlanta refused to allow that to happen, based on the facts presented at trial which proved Leo Frank was guilty. It was one of the biggest trials of the day, so almost no one in Georgia who knew anything about the case believed Frank was innocent.

Before continuing my own story about the evils of our injustice system, here’s an excerpt from an article I wrote a few years ago about the Leo Frank case. Along with a little about how I ended up in Dr. Thomas’s Civil Rights class in Atlanta, Georgia studying the “practice” of law (and the criminals who guard the gate.

After reading, you decide if Leo Frank was guilty or not. And, based on my critical thinking skills, whether or not I should have been given the opportunity to attend law school at the University of Kentucky?

Most Americans have no idea who Leo Frank was, or that his conviction in 1913 led to the 1914 creation of the ADL, formally known as B’nai B’rith.

To begin, here’s some historical background about America’s most progressive southern city and the truth about the hanging of Leo Frank, who happened to be Jewish.

Be warned, you’ll never hear any of these important details from the corporate media, like the Washington “Compost”, Hollyweird, or any of the networks. Like for example, the fact that Atlanta, more than any other city in the south was not anti-Semitic, as been portrayed in almost every false version of Leo Frank’s story. Including the claim that the angry “rednecks” were screaming anti-Semitic slurs through the window of the courthouse during the trial.

Before his legal troubles began, along with being the President of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith, Leo Frank was a married, well-connected, well respected Jewish businessman from Atlanta.

He was convicted in August of 1913 of the murder of Mary Phagan, a thirteen-year-old girl who worked in his pencil factory. Phagan was killed shortly after she showed up on a Saturday morning to pick up her pay at the designated time, as instructed by Frank. The company’s “Negro sweeper” testified he was asked by Frank to stand watch on is day off, saying he had arranged “something” with one of the young girls, and needed Conley’s help.

Conley must have been an extremely important employee of Leo Frank’s, because this same black man was once caught urinating on a box of pencil erasers (as a joke on all the white people he knew would someday put the erasers in their mouths), and wasn’t fired by the boss! In fact, according to the records, Jim Conley actually got a raise shortly after this happened. Hmmm…

Based on the evidence presented, there was absolutely no doubt among any of the jurors that Frank had murdered the girl. The jury voted unanimously to convict him.

According to the newspapers who covered the trial, based on the testimony most of the jurors believed that Frank had brutally raped Mary Phagan while, or after, strangling her. They also believed that he very likely continued to sexually assault her after her death (NECROPHILIAC)!

And maybe that’s why the prosecutors decided to focus their case on the first degree murder charge, and not formally include any charges involving sexual assault despite the overwhelming evidence of Frank’s depravity. Maybe they were worried Leo Frank would be lynched on the spot if he was also convicted of raping the corpse of a thirteen-year-old girl, as he apparently did.

And maybe that’s why those who defend Leo Frank today keep claiming he was convicted of both rape and murder? Maybe they don’t want the question of whether or not he raped her brought up, because Mary Phagan’s defenders might point out that it’s very likely Frank didn’t stop what he was doing when she died…and that idea would certainly embarrass all of his defenders at the Southern Poverty Law Center and the “Compost”.

The trial records which are available online include a mountain of evidence proving that Frank was also a serial rapist and a sexual deviant, praying on many of the young girls who worked at the pencil factory, who apparently were afraid to say no to the boss.

Jim Conley testified that he often stood watch while Frank regularly entertained local sex workers at his family’s Atlanta factory, which he managed.

As I’ll explain below, the physical evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt about what happened.

After leading her into the metal room and after the Phagan girl refused to cooperate, Leo Frank punched her, and then brutally strangled her with a jute chord (and that’s when he raped her).

The coroner’s report included evidence that, much like Ted Bundy did to one of his victims, a victim named Liz Levy, Frank had repeatedly also bitten Mary Phagan’s neck and shoulder while he was raping and strangling her.

One detective who examined the available evidence testified the crime was “unusually vicious.”

On the other hand, a so-called expert on the case . Jewish propagandist, Leonard Dinnerstein, claimed in his 1966 Ph.D. Dissertation [“The Case of Leo Frank”, often cited by the SPLC, the ADL, and the Compost. They claim it was evidence of Frank’s innocence. that the teeth marks on Mary Phagan’s neck and shoulder did not belong to Leo Frank, and this could be proven, scientifically.

Dinnerstein’s claim was based on the writings of a Jewish author named Pierre van Paassen, who said there were X-Ray photographs hidden away somewhere in the Fulton County Courthouse that both showed Mary Phagan’s bite marks and Leo Frank’s dental impression. Except no X-Ray photographs have ever been found, and in fact, do not exist.

Yet Dinnerstein and other Leo Frank supporters embellished this lie by suggesting the missing X-Ray photograph’s were deliberately misplaced or stolen, and if found, based on science would absolutely prove Frank’s innocence.

Dinnerstein and van Paassen ignored the fact that any first year dental student knows the medical technology to even attempt to do this sort of forensic analysis was not available until many decades after Phagan’s murder. And in recent years, the courts in Texas have determined ‘bite mark evidence’, much like the sort of burn pattern evidence that was used to convict Camerin Todd Willingham, is “completely unscientific” and “completely unreliable”.

To further inform the reader, Frank’s defense team didn’t bother to cross examine even one of the twenty female employees (as young as eleven-years-old) who testified that Frank had also sexually assaulted and/or sexually harassed them at the pencil factory where Phagan was raped and murdered, and found with her bloody underwear ripped.

The medical examiner testified that her vagina was torn and bleeding, and there was evidence of what appeared to be seminal fluids present inside her vagina.

Along with the trial records, some possible photographs of the evidence collected are also available online, including a photo of Mary’s bloody dress and her physical injuries, which may only be a depiction of the evidence.

Here’s what’s wrong about this claim. The Washington “Compost”, and the rest of the Zionist-controlled media, claim these photographs have been faked. Kind of like the mushroom cloud images they published, proving that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction hidden in these Mobile vans.

You remember, the corporate media all said we needed to go to war with Iraq, rather than waiting until we knew for sure who had done 9-11. And now we know. They all lied.

Here’s the real irony you ought to know about these hypocrites from the wealthy, corporate, Deep State left, who hate any sort of “white nationalism.” What about “Jewish privilege” or “Jewish Supremacy”? Maybe that’s the conversation we should be having, before Senator Wyden and Senator Grahm don’t make it illegal.

I’m being sexually assaulted by these same gender-impaired, media monsters every day and night with some kind of lasers, and the governor and her state police will do absolutely nothing to make them stop. Maybe that’s what Jeremy Christian was experiencing, weeks, and maybe years, before the MAX stabbing, which left two people dead. And why he was so enraged at the time, screaming obscenities at two Meddle-Eastern looking women.

It would explain why they appointed Gregory Troll as his Deep State lawyer. And why, after his conviction, he was unable to talk about the strange, angry feelings he was experiencing, and said something like, ‘I’m not saying anything about anything, or something might happen to me while in prison (like Ward Weaver)’.

Don’t be surprised, if Jeremy Christian ends up dead, and nobody cares.

Back to Leo Frank:
So you know, the police, the medical examiner, and other experts who examined the evidence at the crime scene testified to the following:
They believed Mary Phagan followed Frank into the main work room, located on the second floor, and was punched squarely in the right eye by a person who they know was left handed. They knew this because the knuckle marks were clearly visible on the left side of the bruise, and not the right.

So you know, Jim Conley was right handed, and Leo Frank was a lefty.

The examiner and others testified that they believed she struck her head on the handle of a metal lave, where strands of what appeared to be her hair and blood were found.

The Lave’s operator testified that he had cleaned the lave after work the previous day, so they knew something must have happened on the second floor of the pencil factory between Friday evening and Saturday evening, when Mary Phagan’s body was found in the basement.

Several forged notes, written on the back of the night watchman’s alleged time card, named Newt Lee, were found in the second floor bathroom.

Apparently, if you can believe it, someone wanted the police to believe that the notes were written by Mary Phagan while she was being raped by Lee. Can you imagine, Frank’s defenders want us to believe that a woman being raped would be able to find a pencil, some paper, and then write down something about her attack (but not identify her attacker) during the actual rape (apparently, right before she passed out and died). So according to Frank’s defenders, she just happened to grab the time card of the man who was raping her, as she quickly scribbled down some notes about her attack.

What we do know is that Heidi Beirich, Mark Potock, Dick Cowen and all of their friends at the SPLC and ADL are really, really sick people, defending a NECROPHILIAC, and blaming a black man!

Within weeks the experts knew this evidence pointing at Newt Lee was completely fake and most likely planted by the real rapist . someone who had easy access to the entire second floor, and who apparently wasn’t worried about being caught.

According to the testimony, after her head struck the lave, Mary Phagan was knocked into a semi-conscious state, and collapsed.

At first, Frank may have only wanted to rape her, and grabbed a nearby cord to restrain her, until he was finished raping her. There’s no evidence that Leo Frank had ever killed any of his previous victims, and therefore, the detectives did not believe that was his actual intent, in the beginning.

than apparently, Frank wrapped the cord around her neck, and with one hand quickly began tearing off her bloomers (her panties), while holding her still with the other hand.

Common sense tells the reader that it’s very unlikely Leo Frank waited until after he raped her before grabbing the cord that we know was used to strangle her. Maybe in the beginning, he only wants “little Mary” to cooperate, and except her situation like the other young girls, and submit to his sexual needs.

But maybe, in all the excitement while he’s trying to hold her down, and doesn’t realize how tight the cord is around her neck, she suddenly dies underneath him.

Experts at the trial testified that they believe the rape began while she was partly unconscious because of the blow to her head, and being strangled, and very likely continued after she died.

They suspected this is what happened since based on the physical evidence present, the rapist had likely not stopped sexually assaulting her until after he had ejaculated. He doesn’t know she is dead, and obviously that’s not what was on his mind at that moment.

Every rape victim knows there are two responses to being raped by someone who is larger and more powerful, to struggle or to remain perfectly still. Obviously, Mary was determined to protect her virginity, and fought her attacker, until the lack of oxygen caused her to pass out, sometime shortly after the rape began.

Since her neck was so small, and extremely fragile, given the pressure and force of the cord applied to her throat they believed it probably only took ten or twenty seconds of being strangled before she lost complete consciousness. And then they suspected it only took less than one minute from the time he wrapped the cord around her neck for the former college athlete, Leo Frank, (who was almost six feet tall) to cause her death.

I suspect the very first thing Frank did after slugging the defenseless, young girl was to grab a nearby cord and wrap it around her neck, in order to restrain her while he carried out the rape. However, when she continued to struggle, he continued to tighten his grip, which likely only caused her to struggle more until she passed out…and then died.

In a moment we’ll get back to the gruesome facts involving this brutal murder (and then rape) of Mary Phagan.

But first, know this- Everyone in the community who knew Mary Phagan knew she was a devout Christian and very obviously still a virgin (before she was raped). Yet Frank’s lawyers, along with trying to blame first one black man, and then another black man, attack Mary Phagan’s virtue (and her alleged virginity).

So before we prove how corrupt the media is in covering up the truth when it comes to crimes committed by Jewish people, here’s some other lies that the Jewish media and their Zionist masters are continuing to tell us about the Leo Frank case. They want the dumb-downed public to believe all this crap, despite that the evidence presented at trial absolutely proves otherwise.

For example, obviously, there was no mob standing outside the courtroom screaming something like, ‘Hang the Jew! Crack the Jew’s neck!’ Never the less, this is exactly what some of these ethnically-obsessed advocates from the media, including a few network and Hollywood producers, would like us to believe about Frank’s trial.

After Frank was convicted by the grand jury (which included four (apparently, extremely anti-Semitic) Jewish jurors), the coroner’s jury, and the trial jury, who all three voted unanimously to convict him, Leo Frank was sentenced to death.

To the shock of everyone in the community, Frank was unanimously re-elected in October of 1913 President of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith while he sat in jail, awaiting execution. Talk about the hubris of these people…

As if this wasn’t enough, in 1914, in response to Frank’s conviction, the ADL [Anti-Defecation League] was formed. And, along with the Southern Zionist Law Center [SPLC], became the muscle for the international Jewish cabal that runs the world’s banking system (and universities). Just how far will they go, I wonder.

Suddenly, most southern’s, including the people of Atlanta, began to feel less friendly toward the Jewish community, a rift that even Lucille Frank, Leo Frank’s wife, knew did not exist before 1913.

In 1915 the Governor of Georgia, John M. Slaton was hired by the most powerful Jewish law firm in all the south [Rosser and Arnold]. And the firm just happened to still be defending Frank when they hired Slaton.

Leo Frank’s lawyers also just happened to be attempting to get their client a new trial when they put the standing governor into their deep pocket, but first they needed to get their client off death row. And for a little cash and position in the firm, Slaton was more than glad to acquiesce and accept their “bribe”.

So just before leaving office, Governor Slaton wrote a 1400 word report claiming Frank did not receive a fair trial. Ironically, his non-binding report included a statement that so outraged the community, it may be the very thing that actually triggered a group of well-organized vigilantes to hang Leo Frank.

In this infamous report, Slaton claimed the blood found on Mary Phagan’s dress was the result of her “monthly sickness!” Except along with collaborating testimony, the viewer can see from the photograph online that the dress appears to be completely covered in blood, as a result of being brutally raped and strangled by Leo Frank. Even if it is only an illustration, it matches the testimony that was given at trial. Yet in a 2017 Washington “Compost” article they claims the evidence about the bloody dress should be completely disregarded, if the photos online aren’t the actual photos, only depictions of the crime scene as it was described by the witnesses in 1913.

Given all of this evidence, you might be surprised to learn, that along with making five Leo Frank propaganda films, these modern Frank defenders also made a movie about Governor Slaton, claiming he was a hero for “rescuing” Frank from the gallows.

And ironically, a Jewish woman, ironically named Heidi “”Be-I-rich”, from the SPLC, and the Washington “Compost” still claim, even today, this sick Jewish man was INNOCENT. A man who raped a thirteen-year-old girl before she died, and very likely didn’t stop raping her, even after she died!

It gets worse. According to a couple pressitutes from Tennessee, who conveniently lost the actual recordings, in 1982 claimed a fake witness came forward on behalf of another ADL fake news story about Leo Frank being innocent.

According to the paper, an alleged eye witness to the murder, Alonzo Mann, recanted part of his testimony over sixty-nine years later, while on his death bed.

Except was he lying in 1913, or was he lying in 1982? Or was he just lying about everything?

In his half-senile recollection of the past, Mann claimed he had lied to the jury about the time he had left the pencil factory that Saturday morning IN 1913. Suddenly he needed to confess his lie (by apparently, telling a bigger lie)

Mann went on to claim that he had seen an African-American sweeper (one of the lowest positions in the factory) named Jim Conley carrying the lifeless body of a young white girl across the first floor lobby of the pencil factory.

Mann also claimed in one of his delusionary statements that he remembered, Conley had reached for him with one arm, while balancing her body on his shoulder, and threatened to kill him if he ever said a word about what he saw.

Then amazingly, Mann claimed he saw Conley throwing her body down a trap door located in the lobby near the elevator (which was located less than ten feet from the front door, in downtown Atlanta).

Apparently, Conley didn’t think to lock the front door before raping and killing the young girl there in the lobby, even though he had several minutes to think about it while she was upstairs collecting her pay from Mr. Frank (who curiously, heard nothing)? And then he still didn’t think to lock the large front door when he decided to pick her lifeless body up and dump it through a very narrow trap door to the basement below? But according to the medical examiner, he didn’t find any broken bones. Hmmm…

and, what about the blood the police found upstairs? Hmmm…

And so apparently, that’s why Alonzo Mann never told anyone until 1982 . because he was still afraid for his life, even twenty years after Conley’s death. Hmmm…

Which is really odd, since at trial this fourteen-year-old white boy testified on behalf of his boss, Mr. Frank, and that he had never once seen him act inappropriately around any of the female employees, even though over twenty female employees testified otherwise.

He had been a loyal and trustworthy employee of Leo Frank’s for three entire weeks, and obviously knew his boss well, when the murder took place? Obviously, Mann knew everything that was going on around there…

So according to the SPLC and the Washington “Compost”, not only am I a “”neo-Nazi” for defending Jim Conley (who happened to be black), we’re supposed to believe this crazy story about how this “new evidence” proves Frank was innocent, and the “Negro” actually did it.

So we’re supposed to believe that on a Saturday morning in 1913 this white teenage boy told his white parents that he had just seen a black man carrying this dead white girl in the lobby of the pencil factory where he worked.

but we’re supposed to believe, they didn’t tell anyone else for the next sixty-nine years?

According to Mann, he told his parents what happened, and they decided the best thing for him to do would be to never, ever tell anyone about the murder. And this way, hopefully, Conley wouldn’t try to hurt him when he returned to work the following Monday, as he did.

Then the Mann’s have a quiet dinner together, and without a fear that Conley might come calling in the middle of the night, they are able to sleep comfortably, without telling anyone else about it. Hmmm…

Even when Conley is arrested that Thursday, for helping Frank cover up the crime, Mann is still unwilling to come forward with critical evidence that would have cleared his powerful and influential boss was innocent. And his testimony would have surely sent a poor black man to the gallows.

Obviously, Mann had no choice in 1913 other than to allow a wealthy “white-looking” Jewish man be put to death for a crime that Alonzo Mann knew he hadn’t committed. Even five days later Mann was still unwilling to tell this version of the “truth”, even though he apparently knew the real murderer was now locked up in the county jail (for lying to the police and tampering with evidence).

But we’ll get back to the one mistake Conley made (by attempting to help Frank cover up the crime), and try to figure out who may have put Mann up to it . figure out who may have most likely bought Mann off in 1982 in order to rehabilitate Leo Frank’s reputation, before Mann would die (of natural causes).

But so you know, Jim Conley was the second black employee Frank and his two Jewish lawyers tried to blame for Mary Phagan’s murder. Does that shock you?

For now, let’s go back to what led to Frank’s hanging. As a result of Governor Slaton’s infamous report, every citizen in Georgia believed his hiring by Rosser was clearly a bribe.

And as many predicted, Slaton rewarded Rosser by commuting Frank’s death sentence to life in prison on his very last week in office. Perhaps wisely, the following day Slaton quietly left the state and didn’t return for over ten years, while continuing to collect a handsome salary from the famous Jewish lawyers and their Atlanta firm.

As a result of the perceived injustice, On Mary Phagan’s birthday a carefully selected group of Georgia’s most respected citizens from the community removed Frank from the state prison in 1915, without incident, and in the most respectful manner possible promptly hung the serial rapist and pedophile near the home of his final victim!

“Little Mary Phagan”, as she was known, only stood 4’11”, while Frank was almost a foot taller than her (And apparently. once played basketball in the Ivy League.).

It’s not likely the SPLC or the ADL will ever tell you the whole truth about Leo Frank (or anything else), and why they need to continue to rehabilitate his history on behalf of the ADL. Although it should be obvious.

For example, Frank’s supporters from the ADL and SPLC haven’t ever mentioned the other twelve-year-old girl Frank raped a year earlier in 1912. After her family learned she was with child, and learned the details about her own rape at the hands of her boss, they sent her away to live with relatives and kept it quiet. That is, until they learned about Phagan’s murder and rape.

When I moved to Atlanta, a “friend”, Marty Allen, drove me up there and helped me to find an apartment. But I should have known such a sleazy character like this would do what he did.

When I worked at the paper, I hung out with Allen, and we smoked weed together. Sometimes he would write stories and make up the people in the article, attributing fake quotes to each of them. I thought it was pretty funny, but I never said anything.

Just before we left Tallahassee he backed his dad’s truck into something, which was pulling a trailer at the time. While I figured the accident was unfortunate, and the damage was fairly minimal, I assumed he had insurance that would pay for it. So we continued on our journey.

When I got to Atlanata, I rented an apartment in the Little Five Points area, and gave him some gas money and weed, and we said goodbye.

However, a few days later he called me, demanding $1000 in extortion money, or would have to do something. He didn’t say exactly what that was, but I figured he was the kind of guy that would make up anything. And with everything else going on in my life, I wondered…

Apparently, he felt I should pay for the damages, even though he was the one who was driving, and I was blind, so I couldn’t help if I wanted to. He said he didn’t want to file the insurance claim on the vehicle, and tell his dad.

Of course, I told him, “Get fucked!” Even though, with the help of Bryant, I imagined he would do a hit piece on me, suggesting all sorts of things. I never found out if he did, and we never spoke again.

I met a woman who was blind, and we moved in together a few months later. She had graduated from Wellesley, and provided me with the motivation to not give up on my degree.

With her help, I got a BA in Pre-law, with honors. She also helped me to file a formal civil rights complaint against Florida State University. It was very impressive. It had that Ivy League touch of professionalism, if you know what I mean.

Not surprisingly, a short time later we received a visit from a former-ATF agent who pretended to fix the bathroom tiles almost every day…for weeks and weeks, and weeks. Every few days he would come over and remount the tiles along the tub and every time the tiles would fall off. Hmmm…

With all my travels, both before and since, I can say Atlanta is the most diverse city I’ve ever lived in. The University campus is located right in the meddle of downtown Atlanta, and adjoined on one side by the estate of the late-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Thanks to William Pepper’s new book, “The Plot to Kill Dr. King: we now know The Truth Behind the Assassination of Dr. King was assassinated by elements of our own government and the U.S. Military in 1968 (Coincidentally, shortly after the SPLC was created to allegedly protect the rights of African-Americans).

So back to the Leo Frank case. I remember our professor from civil rights law class introducing us to the case saying, ‘Along with blacks, there were also many Jewish people like Leo Frank who were lynched.’

In my opinion, this may have been the first untruthful statement I heard Dr. Thomas say involving the Leo Frank case, but it would not be the last time I heard something like this from the American Jewish propaganda machine.

While thousands of innocent African-Americans were lynched, it appears Leo Frank is the only Jewish American who was ever hung in the South.

Given America’s horrific history surrounding slavery and the lynching of so many black Americans, in retrospect, the comparison by our professor seems insensitive, and a little disingenuous.

The same sort of dishonest use of false evidence, along with personal attacks, on Professor Anthony Hall, Professor Kevin Barrett, Professor James Tracy, and many, many others, clearly shows how the international Jewish cabal also runs the university system, and expects professors like Bill Thomas to follow the company line about alleged “Jewish victimization”, or else.

I didn’t know much about the Leo Frank case back then, other than what was in a Hollywood movie he showed us, a movie I had once watched as a kid.

As I listened closely to our distinguished professor Bill Thomas explain the “facts” in the case I began to think about the movie and the part where the mob starts screaming into the windows of the courthouse something about, “Hang the Jew! Crack the Jew’s neck!”

All of us agreed with Professor Thomas, attempting to influence a jury in a capital case in this way was outrageous. I should disclose, one of my great grandparents (Grandma Meltz) on my mom’s side was a Jewish immigrant who fled eastern Europe in the early 1900’s because of the anti-Jewish feelings that were quickly spreading across Europe at the time.

As my civil rights professor spoke, my brain began to think like a criminal defense lawyer. I asked myself, why didn’t his lawyers raise this claim about the screaming racist mob during Frank’s many appeals (all of which he had lost) or trial, a trial record that consisted of over 3,000 pages? This was blatant incompetency by what were supposed to be the best law firm in the South that money could buy. How could this happen, I asked myself? It didn’t make sense…

From the many death penalty cases we studied, I knew attempting to intimidate or rig a jury would be sufficient grounds for an automatic appeal and a re-trial. Why wouldn’t America’s best lawyers include this claim in any of their appeals, I wondered…unless of course, it never really happened and Frank’s modern supporters are lying?

Along with the trial record itself, the truth lies in the fact that there is no mention of any mob screaming racist threats in the windows at the jury in Governor Slaton’s fictional writings or any of the stories printed by any of the three major newspapers who covered every aspect of the trial. These stories included reports about the circus performers and musicians who were entertaining the anxious, peaceful crowd that had gathered outside the courthouse, awaiting the verdict, but there’s nothing in the record about an angry mob.

When I was in Professor Thomas’s class, I was much, much more gullable in those days and believed the corporate controlled media was committed to always telling us the truth. However, for me the cover up of who really did September 11th changed everything, forever…

I believe a new, more trustworthy alternative media is now emerging, and there may still be some hope… But it is up to each of us as citizen journalist to set the record straight and argue each of our case studies the best we can, based on what we know.

Disney, the Times, the Post, and the rest of the corporate owned media will not, and cannot, tell you things that would upset their owners, who own so much more than most of you know. So why we still have them, let’s use our minds and common sense to make sense of what really makes the most sense about Leo Frank, and what really happened here in Oregon on that lonely Harney County road, which caused Lavoy Finicum to suddenly pull his hands down, and rub them against his body.

As these writings document, I believe they are protecting a “Secret” about the ongoing human experimentation’s being done on most Americans. I can testify that every day in this country there are invisible directed energy weapons being used against, children, the poor, racial minorities, the elderly and the disabled (along with Robert Lavoy Finicum’s finger tips, as he was reaching up to indicate his willingness to surrender).

As I’ve written, every day I’m being shot with some sort of weapons, that instantly forces me to rub my hands, feet, face or some other parts of my body that is being targeted. But neither the bi-sexual, compassionate governor, the police, or even the FBI will do anything. Does that seem strange?

You have to ask, is there ever any sort of honest investigation of anything any more, whether it’s the media or the government? Anyone who suggest anything other than the subscribed “text” are publicly vilified, or publicly humiliated, or just killed (On the street or in a cell), or in their home!

The Leo Frank case is a perfect example of how truly far those with power and money are able and willing to go to control our world. Whether it’s a rigged murder trial or another false flag event for the dumb-downed masses.

As mentioned earlier, Jim Conley wasn’t the first black man Leo Frank’s legal team tried to blame for the murder of Mary Phagan. From the beginning Conley later admitted he knew Frank had killed the young girl. Conley testified that he had agreed to help Frank move the body. Conley was on the main floor when Frank killed the young girl, and was called up by Frank when Frank realized he would need Conley’s help.

It was a Saturday, so only a few people were around the factory. Together, Frank and Conley used the elevator to take the body to the basement, and planned to burn her remains in the furnace later that evening. But after drinking some alcohol that night, Conley changed his mind and didn’t return until Monday morning.

Probably because of this, Frank decided to frame the African-American night watchman instead, Newt Lee, who also worked at the pencil factory.

Fortunately for Lee, Frank’s dirty little plan quickly fell apart. Along with several notes allegedly written by the victim while she was being raped, someone attempted to plant one of Lee’s clean shirts at Lee’s home, after using it to wipe up Mary’s blood.

Just like the notes, investigators were able to quickly determine that while the shirt appeared to have been used to wipe up someone’s blood, they knew it had not been worn during the murder since it smelled perfectly clean.

Knowing he was completely innocent, when asked, Lee quickly admitted the shirt belonged to him and was arrested for Phagan’s murder. So, thanks to Frank, Lee spent several weeks in jail before being exonerated and released.

When this happened, Frank’s legal team decided to bring in some outside help to better control the investigation, and hired the best private detectives money could buy.

As a result, the Pinkerton Agency out of New York was hired. And Frank’s lawyers told the Pinkerton people, “We want you to follow the truth, no matter where it leads.” Except when the Pinkerton’s concluded that the murder could only have been committed by Leo Frank, and no one else, they were fired…and were never paid by Rosser (who apparently was more than glad to pay Governor Slaton for his “cooperation”).

And here’s the clincher. Frank’s lawyers hired a second detective agency, who three weeks after the murder amazingly found the actual murder weapon in the lobby of the pencil factory, despite being repeatedly searched by police and the Pinkerton Detectives . the new detective found a piece of bloody twine. Which, according to Rosser and his law partners, proved Mann’s story was true, and proves that Conley must have committed the rape and murder of Mary Phagan in the lobby, without anyone knowing (including his boss, Leo Frank, who was apparently working in his office on the second floor), just forty feet away from Conley when he committed this horrific crime.

In Frank’s defense, his lawyers claimed Conley had tossed her lifeless body threw a two foot-by-two foot trap door. And then dragged her body over to the furnace, where she was found a day later.

Problem with this bullshit, is that Mary Phagan’s body was Autopsied several times by several different people, and she did not have even one broken bone. Since there is a fourteen foot drop, and there was only a narrow, steep ladder going straight down to the basement floor, Mann’s claim that Conley used this trap door to dispose of the body, is completely impossible.

yet in 1986, after years and years of undue pressure, the ADL and SPLC finally won a posthumous pardon for Frank from the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, who claimed Frank had been denied his right to appeal when he was hung. And because of it, the Board said the State of Georgia had failed to protect him, until his formal hanging, as they were required to do. Thankfully, the Board did not exonerate Frank for the murder and rape of Mary Phagan.

The curious thing about his pardon, is that Leo Frank had lost all of his appeals, including his final appeal to the Supreme Court, which ended any further opportunity he would have had to appeal his conviction (despite Rosser’s promise to get him a new trial). So at the very least, for his own safety, Leo Frank would have likely spent the rest of his natural life locked in solitary confinement,until his death.

For the record, I oppose the death penalty in almost all cases. However, there’s no doubt in my mind that Leo Frank was guilty. But his lynching had nothing to do with Frank being Jewish, other than it was the Jewish community who attempted to use their money and influence to escape justice for one of their Jewish leaders. In fact, Leo Frank is still being defended by the Jewish controlled media because he is the original benefactor of the Anti-Defamation League, and his conviction was the reason the organization was originally formed. OUCH!

And what’s really sad about this story today is that the Georgia BAR has a video about the lynching of Leo Frank in which an uninformed African-American young woman is speaking about his alleged innocence (at the hands of those Georgia crackers” and the KKK). My hope is that Bill Thomas didn’t play a role in poisoning this woman’s mind with this nonsense, given that Leo Frank brutally murdered a young girl, and then raped her, because she refused his advances.

And I have to wonder, does she know when she recorded this bullshit video for the ADL and the Georgia BAR that Leo Frank’s Jewish lawyer, Rosser, were more than willing to send two more innocent black men to the gallows for Frank’s crime, if they needed…

Consider this, Mrs. Leo Frank included in her will a request that she not be buried next to her husband, Leo. In fact, she was so afraid that some Jewish organization might someday dig her up and move her body to New York, her dying wish in 1957 was that she be cremated and her ashes be buried in an unmarked grave near her parents.

So in the middle of the night, two of her relatives granted her final wish by going to the cemetery and digging a small hole, and then poring her ashes into it.

Seems kind of extreme for the wife of an innocent man, who they say was wrongfully hung, doesn’t it?

So knowing how dirty politics in America can be, I now have to consider whether or not a woman from Atlanta named Peggy Rosser was involved in my denial to law school, but it is a curious coincidence.

Unlike most other states, the State of Georgia provides vocational training and assistance to its blind and visually-impaired citizens through the state’s vocational rehabilitation agency. There’s a few vocational counselors in the state who specialize in blindness, and I was lucky enough to have a great guy named George Littlefield as my counselor.

However, Peggy Rosser was in charge of the state vocational rehabilitation agency at the time and appears to have been involved in attacking my character from the very moment I arrived in Georgia. Did someone from Tallahassee put her up to this?

here’s what happened. While waiting to gain residency, for financial reasons, I decided to work in the state’s vending program for the blind. I had known several blind vendors from Michigan and Florida and briefly attended Florida’s own training program, before deciding to go back to school.

Apparently, under Rosser’s directions, a woman named Gale Golden for some strange reason decided to interviewed a man named Dave Pearson, who ran Florida’s program and get some “background” on me.

After being terminated from Georgia’s vending program, for no reason, I obtained a copy of my personal file. According to Golden’s notes, Pearson claimed that I had once posed as a “blind preacher in Tampa who was conning people out of their money”. Except, I’ve never been to Tampa.

Since Dave Pearson had once also unfairly terminated me from Florida’s vending program, it became obvious to me that the people who run most of these state vending programs regularly conspire to remove anyone they see as a potential “trouble makers”.

And it’s easy to understand why the state employees who run these Randolph Sheppard Vending Programs would view me this way, in Georgia, Florida and Oregon. I was pretty open about my belief that the program should be designed to allow the vendors to eventually own the vending stands they operated.

Except, currently under the program rules every state owns the stand and gets to keep a good percentage of the profits from their “slave owners”, who actually own nothing!

So this is how I met Dave Pearson. Shortly after moving to Florida in my early twenties, I made friends with two people who were involved in Florida’s vending program, including a guy named Dave Nelson. I had worked for Nelson several times that year. At the time, Nelson had a highly profitable stand located at one of the post offices in Jacksonville, and definitely wasn’t hurting for money (unlike most of us blind people, who can barely afford a six pack).

Sometime that year, I was accepted into the training program run by the same Dave Pearson. Apparently, Dave Pearson and the Florida Department for the Blind had designed a five week training program. I soon learned, the training was held at a small campus, with a separate dormitory, located in Daytona, Florida.

The second weekend I was there, Dave Nelson showed up in town to party (with the current students, some of whom he already knew) which seemed kind of weird. I soon learned why.

Apparently, Nelson was a close friend of Pearson’s, and seemed to have extraordinary privileges, even though he was not enrolled in the program, and was not part of the training process.

That Friday night, me, Dave and a few other trainees, including this great saxophone player from Miami, named Charles Johnson, got some beer. Except Nelson and this attractive young female trainee from Pensacola, Florida (who had this beautiful long black hair, ironically named “Black”) took off with all of our beer.

Of course, I couldn’t blame him for taking off with the only lady in the group, but obviously we shouldn’t have let him carry all of the beer.

After searching the graveyard for almost an hour, where we were told they were hiding, we finally gave up.

Thankfully, by scrapping together what money we had left we were able to buy a couple quarts of some cheap beer. And then spent the evening sitting under a couple palm trees talking about what sort of gag we were going to pull on Nelson when we caught up to him.

So then the next morning Nelson came in to the cafeteria and set down next to me, and pretended nothing had happen. After asking him if he thought he owed us an apology and if he was going to give us back our money, Nelson, who stood about six feet tall and claimed he once played high school football, made some smart ass comment, instead.

So, like any proper gentleman would do in a situation like this, I asked him to step outside with me, even though I was only wearing socks at the time

When he continued to accept any responsibility, the fight was on. After wrestling him to the ground, I beat on his head for a few minutes, UNTIL HE GAVE UP AND cried “UNCLE!” And agree to give us back all of our money (although I’m still waiting).

As I’ve often done in these sort of impossible situations, I decided to give up Florida’s vending program and went back to school.

So, after getting an apology letter from Dave Pearson in 1993, who claimed he had confused me with some one else, I decided to let it go, and wait for the fall semester at Georgia State to begin.

In other words, I let the entire matter drop (and did not seek damages for my lost wages), but that may have been a mistake. Since Rosser and some of these Florida creeps from the blind agency (and maybe some of the other Rosser’s) may have also been involved in sabotaging my law school plans.

So maybe now you understand why I chose to apply to law school in Kentucky, where my biological father was born (Owensboro(), over the Georgia State Law School, where I knew the “Leo Frank Flag” carrying Thomas, and the Rosser’s, had way, way to much influence. But perhaps, maybe it really didn’t matter where I applied to law school?

Once you’re black listed by the elite educators, who always walk on their tip toes around any questions involving Israel or Jewish supremacy, your hope of getting any advanced degree or teaching position is almost impossible.

You might be surprised to learn, my effort to aggressively advocate for the rights of those with disabilities made me more of a threat to the neo-left, than the right. Unlike other minorities, accommodating disabilities can be costly and time consuming, with very little political reward. Other than the best of friends, compassion only goes so far.

At this point, there’s a story I want to share with any disabled students who may be reading this and thinking about pursuing a career in legal studies. You need to be prepared for a very sad truth about how our “justice” system really works.

One of the required courses for my degree was a class called ‘Legal Studies”, which was being offered through the Risk Management Department. The instructor was a professor (and lawyer) named John Truslow. I was told Professor Truslow was a personal friend of Nancy Grace, who had also taught at GSU before she became a television celebrity on Court TV during the OJ trial.

Shortly after the term began I filed a complaint of discrimination against Professor Truslow, since he had designed the class to require that almost every day every student read hundreds of pages of material and then complete these “silly” written assignments that were almost always inaccessible (to any blind student).

For example, you had to read an article and then circle the correct answers in a specific type of colored pen or pencil. Or underline certain words, or number certain paragraphs. It was always some sort of task that was really, really crazy. And most of the tasks we did had nothing to do with studying law.

A student could earn over 3,000 points during the semester. And I argued that at least one third of these points involved meaningless requirements that had nothing to do with the study of law.

Because of it, almost every assignment Truslow handed out required that I have a tutor available every day for a couple hours to help me. Which meant there was no way to get any help to complete the work for my other classes, if I needed it.

I almost always carried at least twelve credit hours per semester, and sometimes as many as fifteen or sixteen hours (along two part-time jobs), so I felt this undue burden based on my disability was unreasonable. And I argued, most of his required tasks were not germane to the stated purpose of the class.

This is not to say the material we read wasn’t filled with tons of valuable information. And to be fair, I would have to admit not only did I learn more from Truslow about law than any other class I ever took, we had weekly spelling tests, that forced me to carefully study the spelling of the words we were using (which always had been my worse subject).

But it was all this extra required “crap” that made it impossible for me to earn a good grade, even though I was learning so much about the law.

So right from the beginning, not only was it almost impossible to keep up with my classmates, but the disability office also complained to the political science department because it also put their office under tremendous stress in their effort to assist me.

As a settlement, Truslow agreed to let me audit the class and retake it when it was next offered. But before this agreement was finalized, at his request we met privately in his office. And he said something I never forgot. Here’s my recollection of that conversation:
“Don, I’m sorry to burst your bubble but this is how it is in the real world, especially the practice of law. No judge is going to care if you’re blind (especially if they’re Jewish), and there’s nothing you can do about it. In law, only the client’s rights matter.”

“And you can bet the lawyers on the other side will do everything they can to overwhelm you with tons and tons of useless documents, hoping you’ll miss some or all of the important ones.”

He went on to say, “Here in this artificial world of academia they can force me to spoon feed you the information, because of your disability. And you’re right, some of it is intentionally just pure garbage. In fact, most of these assignments are intentionally filled with useless garbage. But that’s the actual point of this class. Make no mistake, law is about knowing how to quickly sort out the copper from the gold.”

“So I want you to know. The world isn’t fair, and the practice of law is probably one of the most unfair of all, if you’re hoping to find any justice in this system. And you can bet, the most ruthless are usually the most successful.”

I did end up earning an “A” from Professor Truslow, with second most points in our class, and I never gave what he said much thought at the time…other than to say to myself, “We’ll see about that John Truslow!”

But Truslow was right, and it was probably them most important thing I learned during my lengthy college career. For the most part, the elite who live up on Snob Hill and control our legal system do not give a flying fuck about our rights or our futures! That is, those of us who are forced by happenstance or circumstance to live here in this third America.

So back to my own story, and Bigotucky.

After both my application and appeal were denied, without explanation, I decided to move to Oregon…hoping for another opportunity, and an even break. Little did I know the bigots of Bigotucky, and all their “good friends”, would follow me here to “Oregoon”, as I recently began calling it, and continue there complete destruction of my life…to keep the secret.